-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[docs-infra] Adjust the links to search for issues #11995
Merged
michelengelen
merged 5 commits into
mui:master
from
michelengelen:issues/adjusted-link-for-issue-search
Apr 4, 2024
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
990b4ab
adjusted the link to search for issues
michelengelen a4b956c
aligned link with support page
michelengelen 567703d
removed utf8 param from link
michelengelen d31ab09
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into issues/adjusted-l…
michelengelen e738f41
fixed issue list link
michelengelen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we are missing the extra
is:issue
argument in all of these instances.By going to
/issues
bothis:issue
andis:open
filters are applied.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit of a generalistic question.
is:issue
would exclude them: Do we want to include PRs in this search or not? 🤷🏼is:open
will not show any closed issues, but since the issue might be already asked/solved we absolutely want to have them in this list.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But PRs generally target resolving an issue.
I'm not sure we should be polluting the list of searchable entries by including PRs. 🤷
I just raised the point, that this technically causes a "regression" as compared to the existing approach.
If we actually want to include PRs as well, then sure, all is good, but I didn't see anything mentioned about this in the description, hence the flagging. 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no strong opinion on incuding PRs or not ... Most of the time the search should be accompanied by a search term to limit the results anyways, so the PRs might not be as prominent.
On the other hand you are right about the purpose of PRs in general. There might be additional information in them that could sometimes lead the user to a solution they are looking for, but there are too many ifs and buts in this.
I will add the
is:issue
parameterThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or rather: I will change this to https://github.com/mui/mui-x/issues?q=is%3Aissue
This will naturally include all issue states! 👍🏼
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, that seems to be the most correct. 👍
I double-checked, that adding both
is:open
andis:closed
filters seems to work incorrectly. 🙈The only way to achieve identical results is by applying the following filter: