Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[docs] Clarify feature split between pro and premium #779

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 12, 2021
Merged

[docs] Clarify feature split between pro and premium #779

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 12, 2021

Conversation

oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari commented Dec 23, 2020 •
edited

A proposal for the feature split between the Pro $249/dev (eq. $20/month) and Premium $599/dev (eq. $50/month) plans.

A preview: https://deploy-preview-779--material-ui-x.netlify.app/components/data-grid/getting-started/#feature-comparison I have used the same icons as the ones we have on the coming pricing page.

Capture d’écran 2021-01-06 à 19 42 05

@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2021 12:18
@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member Author

@mui-org/x I have reworked the content, please review.

@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari requested review from DanailH and removed request for mbrookes and dtassone January 6, 2021 14:27
@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari added the docs Improvements or additions to the documentation label Jan 6, 2021
@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari changed the title [docs] Feature split proposal [docs] Clarify feature split between pro and premium Jan 6, 2021
@DanailH
Copy link
Member

DanailH commented Jan 7, 2021

I'm ok with this split. From what I can see the difference is that these features

  • Range selection
  • Excel export
  • Clipboard
  • Grouping
  • Aggregation
  • Pivoting

will be moved to the 'Premium' license and the rest will remain the same but from a business point of view, we will call them 'Pro' instead of 'Enterprise'. Am I understanding this correctly?

DanailH
DanailH approved these changes Jan 7, 2021
View reviewed changes
docs/src/pages/components/data-grid/group-pivot/group-pivot.md
@@ -7,39 +7,39 @@ components: DataGrid, XGrid

<p class="description">Use grouping, pivoting and more to analyse the data in depth.</p>

## 🚧 Tree data [<span role="img" title="Enterprise">⚡️</span>](https://material-ui.com/store/items/material-ui-x/)
## 🚧 Tree data [<span class="pro"></span>](https://material-ui.com/store/items/material-ui-x/)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a note, maybe it is just me but I found it a bit difficult to differentiate the Pro from the Premium icon as the only difference is the color (and they are both blue, just different shades of it).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The shapes are also different, premium is longer.

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member Author

oliviertassinari commented Jan 7, 2021 •
edited

will be moved to the 'Premium' license and the rest will remain the same but from a business point of view, we will call them 'Pro' instead of 'Enterprise'. Am I understanding this correctly?

Regarding the terminology, I think that:

  • DataGrid, is what we reference as the Community version, with an MIT license.
  • XGrid, is what we reference as Enterprise, with a commercial license. We will probably add a GPLv3 (open source license) along the road.
  • DataGrid & XGrid are part of the Material-UI X product. We might/likely move the DatePicker, Autocomplete, and TreeView to Material-UI X, independently from the license. Material-UI X focuses on the hard and richer components, MIT or commercial license. Material-UI focuses on building a design system per se, MIT, it has the simplest boring components, e.g. tooltip.
  • Pro and Premium are two different plans of the Enterprise version, which includes the Material-UI X product.

Is it clear?

@dtassone
Copy link
Member

I think the clipboard export should be in the pro as well as it's a basic feature and it is already working in the current version

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member Author

I think the clipboard export should be in the pro as well as it's a basic feature and it is already working in the current version

@dtassone OK, what I had in mind is already covered by the "Range selection" feature inside the premium plan.

@mbrookes
Copy link
Member

mbrookes commented Jan 11, 2021 •
edited by oliviertassinari

If there's any uncertainty, we can make premium features pro in the future, but much harder to go the other direction.

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member Author

oliviertassinari commented Jan 11, 2021 •
edited

If there's any uncertainty, we can make premium features pro in the future, but much harder to go the other direction.

@dtassone What's the main reason for customers to purchase ag-Grid? Are these reasons under the "Premium" plan? If not, we should probably reconsider. The "Pro" plan is meant for any professional developers, potentially reaching the 1M of developers that uses Material-UI at their day job, leaving on the side the other 1M hobbyist building side-projects. "Premium" targets any advanced cases, especially in the financial industry.

@dtassone
Copy link
Member

Should we summarise the differences as
Pro => for an advanced data table and a nice way of displaying data
Premium => For data analysis, and more advanced use cases

@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari merged commit 73ed882 into mui:master Jan 12, 2021
@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari deleted the pro-vs-premium-2 branch January 12, 2021 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dtassone dtassone dtassone approved these changes

@DanailH DanailH DanailH approved these changes

@mbrookes mbrookes Awaiting requested review from mbrookes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to the documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@oliviertassinari @DanailH @dtassone @mbrookes