Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[core] Fix the l10n helper by using danger instead of actions #8512

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 5, 2023

Conversation

alexfauquette
Copy link
Member

@alexfauquette alexfauquette commented Apr 5, 2023

Context: We are getting usually 2 or 3 l10n PR per week. Contributors can not guess magically how to write a PR that passes the CI on the first try.

To save some maintainer time, and provide quick feedback to contributors, we can send a message listing all the steps to follow to get the CI green.

This has been tested as a github action, but it's for now impossible to display message on PR if they come from forked repositories. So this PR moves to the current danger.js file

@alexfauquette alexfauquette added the core Infrastructure work going on behind the scenes label Apr 5, 2023
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Apr 5, 2023

Netlify deploy preview

Netlify deploy preview: https://deploy-preview-8512--material-ui-x.netlify.app/

Updated pages

No updates.

These are the results for the performance tests:

Test case Unit Min Max Median Mean σ
Filter 100k rows ms 657.4 1,030.3 657.4 831.78 159.506
Sort 100k rows ms 679.2 1,377.4 1,377.4 1,064.14 292.397
Select 100k rows ms 275.5 326 310.8 303.82 18.061
Deselect 100k rows ms 152.6 433.8 226 252.78 96.46

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c913ec5

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Fauquette <45398769+alexfauquette@users.noreply.github.com>
@alexfauquette alexfauquette marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2023 10:14
@alexfauquette
Copy link
Member Author

The mui-bots always keep the message up to date, so I can not at the same time show it's working and have the PR ready for review

Copy link
Member

@LukasTy LukasTy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The mui-bots always keep the message up to date, so I can not at the same time show it's working and have the PR ready for review

No worries, there is the edit history for that. 👌

Great and very quick fix! 👍 🚀

@alexfauquette alexfauquette merged commit 02f40eb into mui:master Apr 5, 2023
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Infrastructure work going on behind the scenes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants