Add Base32 & Base64 on encodeString

[fresholia]

Fixes #2002
Adding encodeString base32&base64

Example:

local str = encodeString("base32", "anan", {})
print(decodeString("base32", str, {})) -- output: anan

local str = encodeString("base64", "anan", {})
print(decodeString("base64", str, {})) -- output: anan

When the PR is approved, I will update it on the wiki.

[fresholia]

I guess it could be done as follows, idk

encodeString("base", string, {radix = 32})

[patrikjuvonen]

Thanks for the pull request! Seems good, I haven't tested this yet but will do so soon.

[patrikjuvonen]

I guess it could be done as follows, idk

encodeString("base", string, {radix = 32})

I think base32 and base64 is better for now.

New review

[sbx320]

Looks good, just some minor changes.

---

In general we might want to look into making Encode/DecodeString a bit less repetitive. But don't bother with it for this PR.

[sbx320]

The StringEncryptFunction name is a bit odd due to base64 not being an encryption method. Maybe we should change this to StringEncodeFunction?

[fresholia]

Thanks for review. I'll edit.

[patrikjuvonen]

@cleopatradev This change is still pending.

[patrikjuvonen]

@cleopatradev This is still an issue.

[TheNormalnij]

base32 should have alphabet option i think.
https://github.com/TheNormalnij/mtasa-blue/tree/TheNormalnij/base32

[Pirulax]

lgtm.

Stale

[Dutchman101]

Exactly what is needed for this to switch from draft to ready for more reviews or merging? The PR was changed to draft status by @patrikjuvonen, maybe clarify the reason or we can mark it as ready for review again.

[patrikjuvonen]

Exactly what is needed for this to switch from draft to ready for more reviews or merging? The PR was changed to draft status by @patrikjuvonen, maybe clarify the reason or we can mark it as ready for review again.

sbx's request for change is still pending at #2016 (comment)

[fresholia]

Wrong branches, wait the new PR