crypto components

[miiu96]

Reasoning behind the pull request

• CryptoComponents

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

• was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
• if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
• if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 37.50% and project coverage change: -0.06% ⚠️

Comparison is base (a9e8794) 80.01% compared to head (d15b092) 79.95%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on feat/test-only-processor-node.

❗ Current head d15b092 differs from pull request most recent head 48c3c01. Consider uploading reports for the commit 48c3c01 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@                        Coverage Diff                        @@
##           feat/test-only-processor-node    #5576      +/-   ##
=================================================================
- Coverage                          80.01%   79.95%   -0.06%     
=================================================================
  Files                                718      719       +1     
  Lines                              94335    94455     +120     
=================================================================
+ Hits                               75478    75525      +47     
- Misses                             13464    13531      +67     
- Partials                            5393     5399       +6     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
node/processingOnlyNode/cryptoComponents.go	34.23% <34.23%> (ø)
node/processingOnlyNode/testOnlyProcessingNode.go	74.44% <77.77%> (+0.37%)	⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[iulianpascalau]

missing comments on all exported items

[miiu96]

done

[iulianpascalau]

I think we need another approach here.
We can leave it as it is and I will fix this in an upcoming PR