Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge in feat #5704

Merged
merged 150 commits into from Nov 13, 2023
Merged

Merge in feat #5704

merged 150 commits into from Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

miiu96
Copy link
Contributor

@miiu96 miiu96 commented Nov 13, 2023

Reasoning behind the pull request

  • Merge

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

  • was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
  • if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
  • if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

SebastianMarian and others added 30 commits April 19, 2023 11:29
…niblocks-dest-me' into improve-requesting-of-missing-miniblocks-dest-me
… accepted as a whitelisted mini blocks for the transaction requester
…niblocks-dest-me' into improve-requesting-of-missing-miniblocks-dest-me
Bumps [github.com/beevik/ntp](https://github.com/beevik/ntp) from 0.3.0 to 1.3.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/beevik/ntp/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/beevik/ntp/blob/main/RELEASE_NOTES.md)
- [Commits](beevik/ntp@v0.3.0...v1.3.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/beevik/ntp
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
bogdan-rosianu and others added 24 commits October 13, 2023 14:23
…ion-example

update guardians tx construction example
Change owner address from SC cross shard
- standardized enable epochs
…omitempty-guarded-info

reference core version with removed omitempty for guarded api field
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (194547c) 79.05% compared to head (131a29a) 79.06%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on feat/test-only-processor-node.

❗ Current head 131a29a differs from pull request most recent head ff03418. Consider uploading reports for the commit ff03418 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                        @@
##           feat/test-only-processor-node    #5704      +/-   ##
=================================================================
+ Coverage                          79.05%   79.06%   +0.01%     
=================================================================
  Files                                728      728              
  Lines                              95452    95517      +65     
=================================================================
+ Hits                               75458    75519      +61     
- Misses                             14635    14638       +3     
- Partials                            5359     5360       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
common/enablers/enableEpochsHandler.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dataRetriever/topicSender/topicRequestSender.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
node/external/blockAPI/metaBlock.go 79.16% <100.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
node/external/blockAPI/shardBlock.go 76.22% <100.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
node/node.go 78.58% <100.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
process/block/baseProcess.go 73.50% <100.00%> (ø)
process/coordinator/process.go 76.49% <100.00%> (+0.66%) ⬆️
trie/branchNode.go 77.94% <100.00%> (+0.29%) ⬆️
vm/systemSmartContracts/governance.go 87.51% <100.00%> (ø)
state/trackableDataTrie/trackableDataTrie.go 83.93% <92.30%> (+0.69%) ⬆️
... and 2 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@miiu96 miiu96 merged commit a2bdb15 into feat/test-only-processor-node Nov 13, 2023
6 checks passed
@miiu96 miiu96 deleted the merge-in-feat branch November 13, 2023 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet