Put back mutex protection

[iulianpascalau]

Reasoning behind the pull request

• put back mutex protection

Proposed changes

Testing procedure

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

• was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
• if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
• if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ace90ef) 80.18% compared to head (103c36c) 80.14%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5833      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.18%   80.14%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         708      708              
  Lines       94035    94039       +4     
==========================================
- Hits        75398    75371      -27     
- Misses      13293    13325      +32     
+ Partials     5344     5343       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gabi-vuls]

Normal allin test: master-ace90ef010 -> revert-mutex-calls-in-trie-103c36cf09

--- Specific errors ---

block hash does not match 7410
wrong nonce in block 3184
miniblocks does not match 0
num miniblocks does not match 0
miniblock hash does not match 0
block bodies does not match 0
receipts hash missmatch 0

/------/

--- Statistics ---

Nr. of all ERRORS: 0
Nr. of all WARNS: 639
Nr. of new ERRORS: 0
Nr. of new WARNS: 0
Nr. of PANICS: 0

/------/

--- ERRORS ---

/------/

--- WARNINGS ---

/------/