Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust OptionalValue. Rename files (to correspond to their containing struct) #7

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

andreibancioiu
Copy link
Contributor

@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu commented May 8, 2024

  • Drop OptionalValue.HasValue (small breaking change). Also see OptionValue. Checking of value presence should be done as checking for nil.
  • Rename some files.

@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu self-assigned this May 8, 2024
@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2024 11:44
@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu changed the title Rename files (to correspond to their containing struct) Adjust OptionalValue. Rename files (to correspond to their containing struct) May 9, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2024

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

@@ -28,6 +28,5 @@ type InputOptionalValue struct {

// OutputOptionalValue holds an optional value (used for decoding)
type OutputOptionalValue struct {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider renaming this in the future. "Optional" is irrelevant now.

@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu merged commit f29b3f1 into main May 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu deleted the rename-08-b branch May 9, 2024 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants