Remove CountPerOp=1 for Vigilante games #533
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nothing comes to mind, sorry. |
inactive123
added a commit
to libretro/parallel-n64
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2020
setting Vigilante 8 games to CountPerOp 1 was apparently a bad idea, performance greatly increased with default framerate setting
inactive123
added a commit
to libretro/parallel-n64
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2020
setting Vigilante 8 games to CountPerOp 1 was apparently a bad idea, performance greatly increased with default framerate setting
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Vigilante games are very demanding on the CPU. Having CountPerOp=1 makes this even more pronounced.
@AmbientMalice you seem to know a lot of the history behind these settings. Do you know why the Vigilante games have CountPerOp=1? I assume we just copied it over from PJ64
I tested the games briefly and they seem to work the same using CountPerOp=2, but much less CPU usage.