You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure if this was intended or not but the latest changes to the trill feature resulted in the trill line taking up more space and, in a way, doesn't allow you to reduce the gap between multiple staffs in ensemble scores. Moving up the trill line only increases the gap while the trill line stays in the same place. This becomes annoying when you're writing large ensembles and one of the pages expands out of the paper view because of space running out due to multiple trill lines.
Steps to reproduce
Create a new score or open up an existing score (preferably concert band/large ensembles).
Add trills to the notes across multiple staffs and measures (2-5 should be good).
Attempt to decrease the gap between the bottom of the staff and the top of the trill line. If you have a lot of instruments within the said score, then you'll notice some of the bottom parts getting cut off cause the trill lines increased the gap between the parts with trill lines.
Issue type
Engraving bug
Bug description
I'm not sure if this was intended or not but the latest changes to the trill feature resulted in the trill line taking up more space and, in a way, doesn't allow you to reduce the gap between multiple staffs in ensemble scores. Moving up the trill line only increases the gap while the trill line stays in the same place. This becomes annoying when you're writing large ensembles and one of the pages expands out of the paper view because of space running out due to multiple trill lines.
Steps to reproduce
Screenshots/Screen recordings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTlvE5vtpGw
4.0:
4.1:
MuseScore Version
OS: Windows 10 Version 2009 or later, Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore version (64-bit): 4.1.0-231921402, revision: github-musescore-musescore-2e3a93a
Regression
Yes, on 4.0
Operating system
Windows 11
Additional context
I don't think this was an issue in MS3 nor in MS4 prior to 4.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: