Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #268123: Wrong vertical position of breath mark #4598

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2019

Conversation

mattmcclinch
Copy link
Contributor

See https://musescore.org/en/node/268123.

The symbol for the breath mark in Emmentaler has a unique appearance, and it is intended to be positioned such that it intersects the top staff line. Other fonts have a symbol that more closely resembles the comma in the palette, and this symbol is intended to be positioned above the staff.

Commit f09f554 was meant to fix the issue linked above, but it repositioned all of the non-caesura breath marks for all of the fonts, rather than just the one breath mark in the MScore font.

This PR also fixes the problem of the symbols not being centered vertically in the palette.

I thought about adjusting the symbol's position in the MScore font itself, but we are already repositioning all of the breath marks anyway during layout. After giving the matter much thought, I have decided that the solution presented in this PR makes more sense.

@anatoly-os anatoly-os merged commit 773439d into musescore:master Jan 25, 2019
@tobik
Copy link
Contributor

tobik commented Jan 25, 2019

The position is now wrong (above staff) for "Bravura", "Gonville" and "MuseJazz". All this fonts can be selected in Style > Score > Musical symbols font

If it is just MScore that differ, shouldnt the condition be != "MScore" rather the == "Emmentaler"?

@mattmcclinch
Copy link
Contributor Author

mattmcclinch commented Jan 25, 2019

The position is correct for all fonts now. It is supposed to be above the staff for all fonts except Emmentaler.

@tobik
Copy link
Contributor

tobik commented Jan 25, 2019

It is supposed to be above? Well, then it is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants