New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugfix issue 3230 #3316
Bugfix issue 3230 #3316
Conversation
Thanks for taking a crack at this bug. It looks like you've run black over the files you've modified, which makes it very difficult to assess the functional changes to the code. Can you please revert the stylistic changes so the diff just reflects the bugfix? Thanks! |
8bfe5c0
to
4f72554
Compare
The black changes have been reversed, thanks for the quick feedback! |
Thanks but I don't think this is the right solution. Better to handle the bug where it was introduced, in the process of reconciling parameters in the body of https://github.com/mwaskom/seaborn/blob/master/seaborn/relational.py#L599 There are two ways to have a defined |
Thanks for the feedback, I've adjusted the code as requested. I now have a better understanding of what is happening exactly. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3316 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.38% 98.38%
=======================================
Files 77 77
Lines 24942 24955 +13
=======================================
+ Hits 24538 24551 +13
Misses 404 404
|
Thanks! |
Dear @mwaskom,
I would love to contribute to the amazing project, so I have tried to resolve issue 3230.
Issue: The
kws
dict contained a list of tuples ofdashes
instead of single tuple for plotting.Solution: Revert code partially back to changes made here
Prevention: add an additional test to check for the existing issue