Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

security considerations #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

security considerations #7

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion draft-welzl-iccrg-pacing.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ If the previous packet was not sent when expected by the pacing logic, but more

# Security Considerations

TODO Security
While congestion control designs, including aspects such as pacing, could result in unwanted competing traffic, they do not directly result in new security considerations.

Transport protocols that provide authentication (including those using encryption), or are carried over protocols that provide authentication, can protect their congestion control algorithm from network attack. This is orthogonal to the congestion control rules.


# IANA Considerations
Expand Down
Loading