Brainstormed some ideas for a cleaner interface for both inline use, …

…and module importing

new_interface.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+# IDEAS for new interface
+
+# option 1 (implicit method name from haskell function)
+class MyClass
+  include Hubris
+  def_haskell(code) 
+end
+
+# option 2 (explicit method name)
+class MyClass
+  def_haskell(method_name,code) 
+end
+
+# option 3 ()
+class Module
+  include Hubris
+end
+
+class MyClass
+  inline_haskell "haskell function"
+end
+
+# option 4 (more humourous)
+class Module
+  include Hubris
+end
+
+class MyClass
+  hubris "haskell function"
+end
+
+#-----------------------------------------
+# include at the module or package level
+#=========================================
+# does importing as_class make sense? no, just include the module
+# when interpreting Haskell module names replace . with ::
+
+# importing std module as a ruby module/class
+hubris :package => "containers", :module => "Data.Map", :as => "Data::Map"
+
+# importing your own module (defaults to module)
+hubris :package => "mypackage", :module => "MyModule" [, :as => "MyModule"] 
+
+# implicit package handling (haskell file in my directory)
+hubris :module => "haskell/shit/MyModule"
+
+# simpler to implement option, allows more flexibility in Ruby land
+module Hubris
+  module Data
+    module Map
+      hubris :package => "containers", :module => "Data.Map"
+    end
+  end
+end