Make when(_ guarantees:) generic #806
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
On second thoughts I suppose you'd want these in addition to the Void versions rather than instead of. |
|
Yes, we should have this, mainly I haven't added it due to fear of ambiguity and the lack of an easy way to know in advance how it will affect the ambiguity of Aside: it's a pity that Swift itself can’t specialize this for us, I'm sure they have reasons, but who ever wants: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I tried this out and it seems to work fine. Is there a reason you restricted
when()to Void guarantees that I'm missing?I'd like to also provide equivalents for the
when(_:_:_:...)helpers but that doesn't seem possible without introducing ambiguity.