Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Suggestion: Use at_uri for uri fields in atproto and bluesky #144

Closed
myConsciousness opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #150
Closed

Improve Suggestion: Use at_uri for uri fields in atproto and bluesky #144

myConsciousness opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #150
Assignees
Labels
atproto A label indicating the package `atproto`. bluesky A label indicating the package `bluesky`.

Comments

@myConsciousness
Copy link
Owner

1. What could be improved

2. Why should this be improved

3. Any risks?

4. More information

@myConsciousness myConsciousness added enhancement atproto A label indicating the package `atproto`. bluesky A label indicating the package `bluesky`. labels Mar 21, 2023
@myConsciousness myConsciousness self-assigned this Mar 21, 2023
@myConsciousness myConsciousness linked a pull request Mar 23, 2023 that will close this issue
7 tasks
myConsciousness added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2023
…se-at_uri-for-uri-fields-in-atproto-and-bluesky

fix: fixed for the issue (#144)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
atproto A label indicating the package `atproto`. bluesky A label indicating the package `bluesky`.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant