Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Command for checking clones in the channel #165

Open
paris-ci opened this issue Apr 4, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Command for checking clones in the channel #165

paris-ci opened this issue Apr 4, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@paris-ci
Copy link

paris-ci commented Apr 4, 2015

Hello,
It would be cool if there is a script in admin.py that allows admins to check for clones in the channel

    XX clone(s) found in #blah.
    *!*@blahefe.net -> user1, user2
    *!*@lol.mi.comcast.net -> BotHey, user3
    *!*@XX.XX.XXX.XXX -> stupid, user
    *!*@vps.dope.ghoti.me -> The, Only, One

Thanks ;)

@kaneda
Copy link
Contributor

kaneda commented Apr 4, 2015

@paris-ci so in the case where two people are legitimately on the same network should it also look at ident, e.g. *!foo@bar.com, or do you want to know when two nicks are on the same net period?

@paris-ci
Copy link
Author

paris-ci commented Apr 5, 2015

@kaneda For my use, *!*@bar.com would be better. But if there is only *!foo@bar.com possible, it's good too.
Thanks

@myano
Copy link
Owner

myano commented Apr 29, 2015

I would recommend against this feature. I have tried to implement such a feature before in WeeChat before somebody else made a stalker.pl for WeeChat. The problem this runs into, no matter how simple the search/caching is, the database that stores all of this will grow outrageously large and slow down jenni way more than she already is. I'll admit she is pretty slow overall in her current state.

@kaneda
Copy link
Contributor

kaneda commented Apr 29, 2015

@myano i agree, we could do this with +@, +%, and +v already, let's leave it at that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants