Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Counters/Links not updated #31

Closed
JovanJ opened this issue Sep 27, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Counters/Links not updated #31

JovanJ opened this issue Sep 27, 2013 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
b:1.8 Branch: 1.8.x t:bug Type: Bug. An issue causing error / flaw / malfunction
Milestone

Comments

@JovanJ
Copy link

JovanJ commented Sep 27, 2013

Upon merging a database, I discovered a bug with the "Last Post" link. Instead of taking you to the last post, it returns with a "The Specified Thread Does Not Exist" message, as it tries to go to a different thread link.

Example:

Click on the "Posts?" link in the first catergory.
It will go to http://dotrb.net/thread-603-lastpost.html
And then it will say:

The specified thread does not exist.

But then going to the normal thread via navigation it will take you to:
http://dotrb.net/thread-595.html

The above issue was fixed, as the links will work correctly now. It was just an example.

As instructed by Dylan Myers, we found that running a Recount and Rebuild fixes the error.

http://dev.mybb.com/issues/1158

@nmalcolm nmalcolm added the 1.6 label Feb 15, 2014
@JN-Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This issue occurs with all softwares we support. While Recount and Rebuild works, we should do this automatically (probably run "Recount and Rebuild" in the cleanup module?)

@JN-Jones JN-Jones added the bug label Jun 12, 2014
@JN-Jones JN-Jones added the 1.8 label Jul 7, 2014
@JN-Jones JN-Jones added this to the 1.8 milestone Jul 7, 2014
@JN-Jones
Copy link
Contributor

JN-Jones commented Sep 7, 2014

Postpointing, for now the docs should say "Use r&r"

@JN-Jones JN-Jones removed this from the 1.8.0 milestone Sep 7, 2014
@JN-Jones JN-Jones added this to the 1.8.1 milestone Sep 13, 2014
@JN-Jones JN-Jones modified the milestones: 1.8.2, 1.8.1 Oct 7, 2014
@JN-Jones JN-Jones removed the b:1.6 Branch: 1.6.x label Mar 28, 2015
@JN-Jones JN-Jones modified the milestones: 1.8.5, 1.8.6 Mar 29, 2015
@JN-Jones JN-Jones changed the title Last Post Mix Up Counters/Links not updated Jun 15, 2015
@JN-Jones JN-Jones self-assigned this Jun 15, 2015
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Split "counters_cleanup" into multiple functions to make it easier to follow
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Remove special code for counters, use cleanup instead
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Add recount to private messages module
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Add update user thread counters function and add some skips
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Update more caches
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
General cleanup
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Fix language string issues
@JN-Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This has been started in a seperate branch too.

JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Fix some smaller issues
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
Remove final notice and update the pmnotice column
@JN-Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This should be finished now. I can't test it atm with bigger boards therefore I'll keep this open till I do so.

JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2015
Add some comments
JN-Jones added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2015
Fix issue with user recount
@JN-Jones
Copy link
Contributor

Tested with several boards and couldn't find any issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
b:1.8 Branch: 1.8.x t:bug Type: Bug. An issue causing error / flaw / malfunction
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants