Skip to content

A high performance Julia adaptation of the code from "Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations" (Gordon et al 2016)

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

myersm0/WatershedParcellation.jl

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

WatershedParcellation

This package introduces a high performance Julia implementation of the parcellation method presented originally in Tim Laumann and Evan Gordon's 2016 paper "Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations.", and based on their original MATLAB code. It builds upon recently registered packages CIFTI.jl, CorticalSurfaces.jl, and CorticalParcels.jl.

Our own new results from this method, a neonatal parcellation generated from a dataset of 261 subjects, can be found here. The paper pre-print is available here.

The goals of this package are:

  • Improve accessibility of this parcellation method to other researchers by:
    • Implementing it with open source tools
    • Substantially improving the execution speed
    • Bringing RAM usage under control (<= 32 GB)
    • Breaking the method into modular, customizable pieces that encourage further experimentation and improvement
  • Extend the Julia language's ecosystem of fMRI-related packages
  • Demonstrate utility of a framework of operations (laid out in CorticalSurfaces.jl and CorticalParcels.jl) for more easily and efficiently working with spatial and functional neuroimaging data in conjunction

System requirements

The method requires handling several large matrices. To generate and evaluate a bilateral parcellational of the cortical surface in a space of 64,000 vertices:

  • 32 GB RAM
  • 4 to 8 CPU cores (recommended)
  • Julia >= v1.9

For working with a single-hemisphere only, you should be able to reduce the RAM usage to 12 GB.

Development status

In terms of the basic stages of operations, the below chart summarizes what's currently ready for use:

Functionality
The core watershed algorithm to generate edge maps from gradients
Flooding of edge map basins to generate parcels
Homogeneity evaluation and null-model testing via rotation

Missing in this implementation is code to generate gradient maps from connectivity, which is a preliminary step for the above. However, that step mostly just involves a straightforward application of Connectome Workbench's cifti-gradient command, and the details of running that will be specific to your dataset and analysis strategy. The file examples/make_gradients.jl shows how you could do this for the single-subject case.

Goals
Single-hemisphere functionality
Bilateral functionality
Exclusion of low-signal regions
Support for loading of spatial data from GIFTI files
A full demo

Installation

From within a Julia session:

using Pkg
Pkg.add("WatershedParcellation")

Performance

Approximate execution times noted below were achieved in running the methods on a single hemisphere in 32k resolution, on a Macbook Pro with 8 Apple M2 cores.

Processing stage Benchmark
Finding local minima in the gradient maps 4 minutes
Generation of an edge map from gradients 3 minutes
Generation of 1000 rotated parcellations 7 seconds
Homogeneity testing of 1000 parcellations 90 seconds

Usage

Before loading Julia, you need to inform it of the number of available processing cores by setting an environment variable, for example export JULIA_NUM_THREADS=8 in bash. Then, within Julia:

using CorticalSurfaces
using CorticalParcels
using WatershedParcellation

See examples/demo.jl for a run-through of the major steps. You would need to edit the config.json in the same folder to point to paths of all the necessary input objects, to adjust parameters, etc. Unfortunately, due to the sizes of some of the required inputs, I'm unable to include these artifacts in this repo but I aim to find a way to get around that soon. Some excerpts below from demo.jl demonstrate the main functions available in this package. You may need to manually trigger the garbage collector with GC.gc() at times, if you're operating under RAM constraints.

Step 1: edgemap creation

Creation of the edgemap is the most computationally costly part of the process, and is preliminary to making the parcels themselves. Supposing you have a matrix grads of size #vertices x #vertices, such as would be computed in examples/make_gradients.jl, and a CorticalSurface struct c to provide the vertex space and related spatial information (see CorticalSurfaces.jl for details):

minima = find_minima(grads, c)
edgemap = run_watershed(grads, minima, c)

Step 2: parcel creation and cleanup

The edgemap then goes into a second pass of watershed, and a much faster one because this time it's operating on a #vertices vector rather than a large square matrix. This is where the initial parcellation is created:

labels = run_watershed(edgemap, c)

Then, because CorticalParcels.jl does not yet support working with a bilateral Parcellation struct, just pull out the left hemisphere for now and make a Parcellation{Int} struct from that:

hem = L
verts = @collapse vertices(c[hem])
px = Parcellation{Int}(c[hem], labels[verts])
edges = pad(edgemap[hem][:], c[hem])

The following are the cleanup operations then applied, to do things like merging small parcels and thresholding the parcel map at a certain edgemap height value. All of these are following the original methods from Gordon et al, but the intention of this package is to allow you a lot of freedom in omitting and/or modifying these steps or supplying your own:

remove_weak_boundaries!(px, edges; threshold = 0.3, radius = 30)
merge_small_parcels!(px, edges; minsize = 30, radius = 30)
threshold!(px, edges; threshold = 0.9)
merge_small_parcels!(px, edges; minsize = 30, radius = 30)
threshold!(px, edges; threshold = 0.9)
remove_articulation_points!(px; minsize = 4)
remove_small_parcels!(px; minsize = 10)

Step 3: homogeneity evaluation

Now that we've made a parcellation, we want to test the method's effectiveness by evaluating the homogeneity of its parcels, relative to a null distribution of 1000 randomly rotated versions of the same parcellation.

First, to get the randomly rotated parcellations to be used for null model testing:

using NearestNeighbors

# make a KDTree that will assist in nearest neighbors search in the rotation process
tree = KDTree(coordinates(c[hem]); leafsize = 10)

# generate 1000 random 3x3x3 arrays that will be used to rotate the parcels
rotational_params = make_rotations(1000)

# now with the help of those two items, create a vector of 1000 rotated parcellations
# which will be compared against the real parcellation for homogeneity testing below
pxθ = rotation_wrapper(px, rotational_params, tree)

Now, load in a dconn (dense connectivity matrix file) with which you want to evaluate parcel homogeneity, and make a covariance of correlations matrix.

using CIFTI
using StatsBase: cov
dconn = CIFTI.load(config["dconn"])
cov_corr = make_cov_corr(dconn[L, L], c[L])

Now use it to test the parcel homogeneity of the real parcellation and of the 1000 rotations:

real_homogeneity = homogeneity_test(px, cov_corr; criteria = p -> default_criteria(p))
rotated_homogeneity = homogeneity_test(pxθ, cov_corr; criteria = p -> default_criteria(p))

Notice the keyword arg for which we're passing p -> default_criteria(p). This is one of the strenghts of the current implementation: instead of the supplied default_criteria function, you could pass in a function specifying your own parcel inclusion criteria, possibly involving other objects in your workspace such as a map of low-signal regions that you want to exclude. Then, in any individual parcel undergoing a homogeneity test, upon receiving a false return value from this criteria function the result will be NaN and a homogeneity score will not be calculated. This is in order to exclude calculation of homogeneity for parcels that overlap with the medial wall, at a minimum, since functional measures (and therefore homogeneity) will not be defined within the medial wall, or to impose a minimum parcel size criterion, etc. See the full demo for more details.

Finally, compare the real and the rotated results (null model) by taking the mean homogoneity of the real parcellation minus the mean of the same from all rotated parcellations, divided by the standard deviation of homogeneity from the rotated parcellations, to get a z-score:

zscore = summarize_homogeneity(real_homogeneity, rotated_homogeneity)

Build Status

About

A high performance Julia adaptation of the code from "Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations" (Gordon et al 2016)

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages