Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How can we statistics mAP after MGP? #15

Open
lishangyu opened this issue Apr 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

How can we statistics mAP after MGP? #15

lishangyu opened this issue Apr 28, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@lishangyu
Copy link

dear author,
Thank you did a great job! I have thought about using optical flow to suppress false negative on object detection mission.But I am confused with mAP calculation, chould you tell me the formulation about mAP?
When I use caffe run some detection code like SSD,fast-RCNN,it chould calculate mAP when the forward propagation finished, I think MGP is a idea after CNN-net,so how can we statistics mAP again?Meanwhile, did this algorithm improve either mAP or recall. I thought is should be recall.
thanks a lot!!!!!

@wudiX
Copy link

wudiX commented Oct 31, 2017

I meet with the same problem as yours. I'm trying to understand the the code calculating the mAP in SSD layer 'Detection_output_layer'.
By the way, do you really understand the principle of MCS (mult-context suppression) in this paper. It says the MCS is for suppressing those false positives. It first sort detection scores in descending order. Then it divides scores into 'high-confidence' and 'low-confidence', and those 'low-confidence' scores are suppressed. But I think that if the score of false positive is very high, the false positive will be considered as 'high-confidence'. This is not we desire. So is MCS really works in improving detection accuracy?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants