Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customisable defect types #1674

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 23, 2017

Conversation

pezholio
Copy link
Contributor

@pezholio pezholio force-pushed the issues/forcouncils/160-customisable-defect-types branch from 29c15e7 to cdcedf3 Compare March 20, 2017 14:31
@pezholio pezholio requested a review from dracos March 20, 2017 14:31
Copy link
Member

@dracos dracos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haven't had time to give a thorough looking at, but as this only affects Oxfordshire I think I'm happy with it enough for it for now. One possible change, and I'd like the commits squashed/tidied (it's not clear what a defect type is/is for at present, I think :) ).

}
$rs->search($attrs, {
order_by => 'name',
join => { 'contact_defect_types' => 'contact' },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this function is always called with a category, so doesn't really matter, but we don't want to do this join if $category is not set, I imagine.

@dracos dracos added Reviewed and removed Reviewing labels Mar 21, 2017
@pezholio pezholio force-pushed the issues/forcouncils/160-customisable-defect-types branch from cdcedf3 to 515362a Compare March 23, 2017 12:14
@pezholio pezholio merged commit 515362a into master Mar 23, 2017
@pezholio pezholio removed the Reviewed label Mar 23, 2017
@dracos dracos deleted the issues/forcouncils/160-customisable-defect-types branch April 13, 2017 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants