-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve, and ideally make comprehensive, our coverage of navigation authorities #1254
Comments
I've started a wiki page: |
Richard, |
I think this is essentially complete - please see the above link on FOIWiki. |
Coverage has improved substantially in recent months. I have recently tagged some local authorities as navigation authorities and added notes. We now have 114 navigation authorities on the site. In my view, our coverage of navigation authorities is significantly better than that of Wikipedia. This is the best list against which to check our coverage: I will close this now because I feel that the original ticket has been addressed. If there are further specific improvements identified then new tickets can be opened as needed. |
One possible source to compare our data with:
https://waterways.org.uk/waterways/uk-canal-map/who-maintains-the-uks-canals-and-rivers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: