-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added --stamp option, --stamp tests, and fixed two typos #4
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for contributing.
This feature sounds reasonable to me.
Could you fix some things?
/coverage | ||
/lib |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please revert this change.
The result of builds should not be included in git repo.
@@ -223,4 +223,22 @@ NETWORK: | |||
`); | |||
})); | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
//-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
describe.only("--stamp option", () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove .only
.
Done. |
Done
…______________________________________________________
Twitter: @virtualpatterns
Web: http://www.virtualpatterns.com
On Dec 22, 2016, at 11:49 PM, Toru Nagashima ***@***.***> wrote:
@mysticatea requested changes on this pull request.
Thank you for contributing.
This feature sounds reasonable to me.
Could you fix some things?
In .gitignore <#4 (review)>:
> /coverage
-/lib
Please revert this change.
The result of builds should not be included in git repo.
In test/generate.js <#4 (review)>:
> @@ -223,4 +223,22 @@ NETWORK:
`);
}));
});
+
+ //--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ describe.only("--stamp option", () => {
Please remove .only.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (review)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR4Hhcop-b3AwlnxCXke6UbqNr9Bs9Mks5rK1LPgaJpZM4LUXdj>.
|
Thank you! However, this PR still includes the result of builds ( |
Done … try again :-)
…______________________________________________________
Twitter: @virtualpatterns
Web: http://www.virtualpatterns.com
On Dec 23, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Toru Nagashima ***@***.***> wrote:
Thank you!
However, this PR still includes the result of builds (/lib and /bin). Could you remove those?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR4HkUS2zGwyCNLQrTuSG538NzaDK3Hks5rLF1hgaJpZM4LUXdj>.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you!
First time doing this ... be gentle :-)
Rationale is that sometimes, in development, I want to force an update even if nothing's changed in my app.