Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(iroh-bytes): range spec seq identification of single blobs #1421

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

divagant-martian
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Notes & open questions

Change checklist

  • Self-review.
  • Documentation updates if relevant.
  • Tests if relevant.

@divagant-martian divagant-martian changed the title fix(iroh-bytes): range soec seq identification of single blobs fix(iroh-bytes): range specc seq identification of single blobs Aug 28, 2023
@rklaehn
Copy link
Contributor

rklaehn commented Aug 28, 2023

Yeah, sorry about this. I forgot how my own code works.

I think we should rename fst_ofs and snd_ofs to fst_span and snd_span since these are not offsets but differences.

We can assume that fst_val is not empty because we assume that the RangeSpecSeq is always canonicalized.

@divagant-martian divagant-martian changed the title fix(iroh-bytes): range specc seq identification of single blobs fix(iroh-bytes): range spec seq identification of single blobs Aug 28, 2023
@divagant-martian divagant-martian added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 28, 2023
@divagant-martian divagant-martian removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Aug 28, 2023
@divagant-martian divagant-martian added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 28, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit c3e701f Aug 28, 2023
15 checks passed
@divagant-martian divagant-martian deleted the range-seq-spec-as-single-bug branch August 28, 2023 17:58
@b5 b5 added this to the v0.6.0-alpha2 milestone Sep 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants