refactor(iroh-net): Avoid using .unwrap() calls #2046
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is an attempt at an audit of all the .unwrap() calls in iroh-net. A few are replaced by .expect() with clear reasons why they're reasonable. Some are replaces by non-panicking versions which will never take the failure branch because of the invariants that are supposed to be upheld. Closes #1528
dignifiedquire
approved these changes
Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is an attempt at an audit of all the .unwrap() calls in iroh-net.
A few are replaced by .expect() with clear reasons why they're
reasonable. Some are replaces by non-panicking versions which will
never take the failure branch because of the invariants that are
supposed to be upheld.
Closes #1528
Notes & open questions
This was surprisingly horrible and long to do. Oh well.
Worth reviewing in detail I'm afraid.
Change checklist