Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate possibility to implement S3 and do so #3

Closed
nagisa opened this issue Dec 31, 2011 · 1 comment
Closed

Investigate possibility to implement S3 and do so #3

nagisa opened this issue Dec 31, 2011 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@nagisa
Copy link
Owner

nagisa commented Dec 31, 2011

Investigate and test if it is possible to effectively use S3 or some other cloud file storing service as storage backend for BFM.

If it does seem possible and reasonable in terms of simplicity and speed, implement this.

@ghost ghost assigned nagisa Dec 31, 2011
@nagisa
Copy link
Owner Author

nagisa commented Jan 14, 2012

Implementation is possible however it is pretty hard to install dependency tree. Also it would require a lot of hacking to achieve full functionality of regular file system. Getting full directory tree may require n requests and would use up a lot of requests very quickly. Also it would be very slow compared to Amazon native file manager.

Therefore, I think that it is better use Amazon native file manager.
However, any ideas are welcome and I will gladly implement this feature if I find (price/speed) effective solution.

@nagisa nagisa closed this as completed Jan 14, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant