Autotools backport #50
Conversation
- RemoveFromMemoryPool - fixed handling of pending names when reorganizing the block chain - version-dependent arguments in UPNP_AddPortMapping (miniupnpc 1.5 vs 1.6)
Merge pull request namecoin-qt#14 from namecoinq/master
bitcoin repository. Builds (without Qt) on Mac OSX.
MacPorts install.
Conflicts: configure.ac
Namecoin code hasn't been refactored to match the library modules. namecoin-qt can't link against libnamecoin_common.a because of circular references. Put libnamecoin_common.a objects in libnamecoinqt. Don't build src/test if --with-qt.
|
Has somebody tested this pull request ? |
|
I've only had minor troubles on OS X but got it working for the non GUI. This is owning largely to my stupid configs, OS X's lack of a coherent dependency management system, and my not caring enough to test the GUI component : P I cannot speak for other architectures. I would ask on IRC. |
|
I will try building the GUI version on the OS X dev machine tonight. If you can get it to build on Linux, we are good to go. |
|
Alright, I thought my build troubles earlier were my own fault, but I cannot get this to build even on a fresh dev machine. Gist with log here: https://gist.github.com/nmcbot/9403870 Happy to give anyone who wants to try remote access to my machine. |
|
Is this obsolete? Looks overly complicated. |
|
@phelixbtc Last I heard OS X building was still messed up in the main repo, which this PR is supposed to fix. So it's still relevant, but I'm not sure if @indolering had any luck verifying that this PR works. |
|
I can get it to built the non-qt version which is a major improvement. Others can get this to build on Linux and Windows then I would support accepting the pull request. |
|
Figured out what's wrong with 10.9, just linking these here for future reference: bitcoin/bitcoin#2806 @phelixbtc Are you able to get this to build on Windows? Can someone with a local Ubuntu install try it out? |
|
Autotools on windows is somewhat inconvenient to install so I'd rather not try but stick to easywinbuilder which is a piece of cake. |
|
If we are basing on Libcoin, this just doesn't make any sense. I really want to get it building on my own machine so we can have an official binary but now there is some sort of issue with 10.9. I will try one more time on my older machine using 10.8. Anyway, @domob1812, I'm voting to reject this pull request, I can maintain my own fork and provide binaries from that until the Libcoin rebase is finished. |
Backport of Bitcoin's Autotools, fixes OS X build issues.