Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

guppy_basecaller_duplex generated six fastq files from 252 fast5 files.... #10

Closed
MostafaYA opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@MostafaYA
Copy link

Hi,
I used guppy_basecaller_duplex on data produced with the kit SQK-NBD112-24 on FLO-MIN112 flowcell.

The Following error appears and out of 252 fast5 files, ONLY six fastq files were produced. That I feel is a big loss of data if this
is ok.
This was the error "repeatd many many times with different sample id"
[guppy/error] basecalling::PriorityReadQueue::pass_read_pair: Cannot process duplex read pair 9b230638-706f-43b7-a1b4-f2ff63fe410d, 4a1468c9-0093-40b5-8785-328b331cff11 as sample count 324630 is over maximum supported by caller of 160000, putting on output queue

Despite the above error, guppy_basecaller_duplex said Basecalling was successful
********* Caller time: 1135416 ms, Samples called: 185914147, samples/s: 163741 Finishing up any open output files. Basecalling completed successfully.

This was my call
guppy_basecaller_duplex -i fast5_pass/ -r -s duplex_calls -x auto --kit SQK-NBD112-24 --flowcell FLO-MIN112 --chunks_per_runner 16 --duplex_pairing_mode from_pair_list --duplex_pairing_file duplex_output/pair_ids_filtered.txt --trim_barcodes --compress_fastq

NB. The config file q20-fixed-2.0-ft-10M.cfg was not available is guppy version 6.1.2+e0556ff. Hence I used flags --kit and --flowcell. Also I used the config file dna_r10.4_e8.1_sup.cfg. No imporovement

@cjw85
Copy link
Member

cjw85 commented May 9, 2022

Hi @MostafaYA,

You are better off emailing support@nanoporetech.com or asking this question in the Nanopore Community; it is a different team internally that supports Guppy than those which develop and can support this duplex_tools project.

@cjw85 cjw85 closed this as completed May 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants