Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade gatsby-plugin-netlify-cms from 6.12.1 to 7.12.1 #24

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

naoharu
Copy link
Owner

@naoharu naoharu commented Feb 3, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 641/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.4
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-JSON5-3182856
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3042992
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3043105
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3105943
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-TERSER-2806366
Yes No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: gatsby-plugin-netlify-cms The new version differs by 250 commits.
  • 7efd49e chore(release): Publish
  • 6b6eeb7 chore(gatsby-plugin-netlify-cms): add deprecation notice (#38753) (#38754)
  • 8919f51 chore(release): Publish
  • bba81d6 chore: update gatsby-adapter-netlify version manifest (#38745) (#38746)
  • 04030d1 chore(release): Publish
  • 3380c59 fix(gatsby-source-contentful): don't apply parent node links to child nodes (#38728) (#38730)
  • 4d78fba chore(release): Publish
  • f713e59 fix: re-install lmdb when detecting the absence of @ LMDB prebuilt packages (#38691) (#38707)
  • c5ec678 chore(release): Publish
  • 1090558 feat(gatsby,gatsby-adapter-netlify): support pathPrefix and trailingSlash options (#38666) (#38701)
  • 3ce63a4 chore(release): Publish
  • 8ae5702 fix(gatsby-adapter-netlify): adapter use headerRoutes (#38652) (#38674)
  • 8ae8281 chore(release): Publish
  • c43080f fix: respect 'force' and 'conditions' properties on redirects (#38657) (#38664)
  • 4bf84f0 test(adapters-e2e): deploy to platform instead of ntl serve (#38643) (#38662)
  • 67c8832 test: bump node version for pnp tests (#38656) (#38663)
  • 6869562 fix(gatsby): Adapter header rules (#38644) (#38661)
  • 4a76878 chore: added logging for cache handling (#38654) (#38660)
  • 470d182 chore(release): Publish
  • 02e925a fix(gatsby): support multiple instances of same variable in gatsbyImage placeholderUrl (#38626) (#38647)
  • 8302bc8 fix(gatsby): don't force leading slash for external paths in routes manifest (#38639) (#38646)
  • 39d2fd8 chore(release): Publish
  • acb8799 fix(gatsby): open lmdb instances in writeable locations in generated ssr/dsg function (#38631) (#38638)
  • 1e8748c chore(release): Publish

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
馃 View latest project report

馃洜 Adjust project settings

馃摎 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

馃 Prototype Pollution
馃 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants