get_snmp without acl

[ogenstad]

No description provided.

[mirceaulinic]

Hi @ogenstad is this a fix for #113?

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 79.587% when pulling 2fc5d16 on ogenstad:snmp into 3aee29e on napalm-automation:develop.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 79.587% when pulling 2fc5d16 on ogenstad:snmp into 3aee29e on napalm-automation:develop.

[ogenstad]

@mirceaulinic, yeah it was just to show a different solution.

[bewing]

Why is the regexp trying to match group? EOS documentation states that group shouldn't show up in that command.

https://www.arista.com/en/um-eos-4172f/eos-section-38-4-snmp-commands#ww1154277

[ogenstad]

Have no idea about group, I didn't touch that part.

[dbarrosop]

I have no idea who wrote that and because of the split of the repos seems that some bits of ownership has been lost :(

@mirceaulinic was that you?

[mirceaulinic]

Yes, I have probably missed that. However, I didn't notice anything bad so far.

[dbarrosop]

No worries, just dead code. Can we just remove it then?

[mirceaulinic]

Yes, I think @bewing's proposal in #114 will not use that textfsm anymore.

[dbarrosop]

Right... should we close this PR then?

[mirceaulinic]

Anyway that group part is ignored when the regex is evaluated.

I let you decide which is more maintainable on the long term, I am perfectly fine with both approaches. I know you don't like TextFSM so I think we can close this one indeed.

[mirceaulinic]

I am going to close this one, in the favour of #114.

Thanks @ogenstad!