You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently sites are divided into two groups: those which have less than 10% of their initial ore remaining, and all the others. This corresponds to the minimized/maximized state of the YARM list.
For the future, I'd like to change that to a set of configurable filters:
less than X% remaining
sites with estimated time to depletion less than X minutes (@tivec))
idle sites (not including untapped sites (at 100% remaining)) (@tivec)
sites with miners that no longer have anything under them
active sites (being mined, i.e., non-zero ore-per-minute/miners are present) (@tivec)
sites with [specific ore] -- which can include a virtual "total" site summarizing all the data (@cpw)
all sites with warning conditions (i.e., union of the first two filters)
all sites
Where applicable, the filters' numbers should be configurable, with separate values for finite (e.g., ore) and infinite (e.g., oil) resource sites, as the same numbers don't usually make sense for both.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently sites are divided into two groups: those which have less than 10% of their initial ore remaining, and all the others. This corresponds to the minimized/maximized state of the YARM list.
For the future, I'd like to change that to a set of configurable filters:
Where applicable, the filters' numbers should be configurable, with separate values for finite (e.g., ore) and infinite (e.g., oil) resource sites, as the same numbers don't usually make sense for both.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: