Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address Open Science 101 suggestion in issue #650 #747

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Module_1/Lesson_2/readme.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ In addition to improved scientific accuracy, adhering to open science practices

#### Emerging evidence that some aspects of open science can increase your citations.

Publishing open access increases citation count by 18%, according to a 2018 [study](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176083/).
Publishing open access increases citation count by 18%, according to a 2018 [study](https://peerj.com/articles/4375/).

Articles that make their data openly accessible via a direct link to a repository see ~25% higher citation impact, according to a 2020 study.
Articles that make their data openly accessible via a direct link to a repository see ~25% higher citation impact, according to a 2020 [study](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176083/).

Publishing as open access may have prohibitive costs for some researchers depending on the venue. There are often other options that allow authors to share their work freely and openly. In Module 5 on Open Results, we discuss some of these other options including preprints and diamond open access.

Expand Down