Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assume 90 degree Earth avoidance for LyAl background #72

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2021

Conversation

mcoughlin
Copy link
Collaborator

Brian request: Assume 90 degree Earth avoidance for LyAl background

@mcoughlin mcoughlin requested a review from lpsinger June 15, 2021 14:34
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #72 (e6f3f16) into main (25ea652) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #72   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   30.36%   30.36%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        1683     1683           
=======================================
  Hits          511      511           
  Misses       1172     1172           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dorado/scheduling/mission.py 93.75% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 25ea652...e6f3f16. Read the comment docs.

@lpsinger
Copy link
Contributor

That's a very large Earth avoidance angle. It will cut out half the sky. Are you sure about this?

By "LyAl", do you mean Lyman alpha? Why is this a concern, and why is it related to the Earth limb angle?

For Dorado's Earth limb, we are only worried about airglow.

@lpsinger
Copy link
Contributor

Also would you please put a bullet point in the docstring to explain the value for the Earth avoidance angle?

@lpsinger
Copy link
Contributor

Ahh, I see... From the [HST STIS handbook(https://hst-docs.stsci.edu/stisihb/chapter-6-exposure-time-calculations/6-5-detector-and-sky-backgrounds):

Background due to geocoronal emission originates mainly from hydrogen and oxygen atoms in the exosphere of the Earth. The emission is concentrated in a very few lines. The brightest line is Lyman-α at 1216 Å.

(Dorado doesn't worry about Lyman alpha because it is outside our bandpass, so now I understand where the concern is coming from for UVEX.)

@bwgref, would you please confirm this 90° number? Does this apply at all times, or only during orbit day?

@bwgref
Copy link
Contributor

bwgref commented Jun 15, 2021

Correct. There's a whole research thread by Shri here about the intensity of the 1216 AA line with respect to the Earth limb. But an important caveat is that this is an "enhanced background" limit, not a "we can't point the spacecraft here" limit for ToOs. For the all-sky survey we'd preferentially avoid this part of the sky to get the deepest observations.

For Dorado since you've got refractive optics you already kill off all of the 1216 emission anyways and you only care about the oxygen lines. For UVEX we're above the residual atmosphere, so we don't care about the oxygen lines.

@lpsinger
Copy link
Contributor

@bwgref, what about the other part of this question: do you want different sun avoidance angles for orbit day and orbit night, as we have for the Dorado configuration?

@bwgref
Copy link
Contributor

bwgref commented Jun 15, 2021

@lpsinger No. Since UVEX is in HEO, we don't experience the orbit day/night transitions like in LEO. So our eclipses are rare and usually only a few hours long.

@lpsinger lpsinger merged commit 21539ad into nasa:main Jun 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants