Use set comprehension directly instead of calling set()

[ThibFrgsGmz]

Originating Project/Creator
Affected Component
Affected Architectures(s)
Related Issue(s)	void
Has Unit Tests (y/n)	n
Builds Without Errors (y/n)	Let CI run
Unit Tests Pass (y/n)	Let CI run
Documentation Included (y/n)	n

---

Change Description

The goal of this PR is to use set comprehensions directly instead of calling set().

Rationale

The Pythonic way to create a set from a generator is to use comprehensions. It is not necessary to use set around a generator expression to get an object of that type, since there are understandings for those types.
Using comprehensions instead of methods is slightly shorter.

Testing/Review Recommendations

void

Future Work

void

[LeStarch]

Looks good, confirmed this feature is in 3.7+