Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Imagery View] View large has a delay for image sizing #5053

Closed
1 of 5 tasks
jvigliotta opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5054
Closed
1 of 5 tasks

[Imagery View] View large has a delay for image sizing #5053

jvigliotta opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5054

Comments

@jvigliotta
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

If you choose to "view large" on an imagery item in a display or flexible layout, there's a 400ms delay for the image to resize to fit the new large container.

Expected vs Current Behavior

Should not have a delay.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Select the "View large" option for imagery in a display or flexible layout
  2. Notice there is a delay before the image is enlarged to fit the larger container

Impact Check List

  • Data loss or misrepresented data?
  • Regression? Did this used to work or has it always been broken?
  • Is there a workaround available?
  • Does this impact a critical component?
  • Is this just a visual bug with no functional impact?

Additional Information

@jvigliotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Testing

  • view large an imagery view in a display or flexible layout
  • note that there is no delay for the image to be enlargenated (yes... that's not a word, but it should be no?).

@jvigliotta jvigliotta changed the title [Imager View] View large has a delay for image sizing [Imagery View] View large has a delay for image sizing Apr 11, 2022
@shefalijoshi
Copy link
Contributor

Verified fixed

@akhenry
Copy link
Contributor

akhenry commented Apr 25, 2022

Verified fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants