Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve unit tests to validate various content models / scenarios #31

Open
sdedios opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@sdedios
Copy link
Member

sdedios commented May 8, 2020

I'm noticing that we have a number of issues that probably should be caught with good unit tests.

We need to create a set of tests that exercise various features under a number of content scenarios.

@sdedios sdedios added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers labels May 8, 2020
sdedios added a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2020
Added new editorconfig file for consistency of editing experience.
Updated Jest.
Fixed issue with fetch option not getting picked up.
Fixed bug in linking _updatedAt metadata (issue #28).
Added new metadata unit tests for _updatedAt fix (issue #31).
sdedios added a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2020
Added new support for legacy and cosolidated capture of metadata.
Added capturing of revision, createdAt, and updatedAt (issue #29).
Cleaned up metadata unit tests to be organized by data scenario (issue #31).
@sdedios sdedios self-assigned this May 9, 2020
@uoojin1
Copy link

uoojin1 commented Jun 27, 2020

I think this one can be a good entry point to understand this project. Could you describe the issues in more detail?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants