Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
update kustomize roadmap 23-24
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
natasha41575 committed Sep 29, 2023
1 parent 9920586 commit b834d8a
Showing 1 changed file with 139 additions and 78 deletions.
217 changes: 139 additions & 78 deletions ROADMAP.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,112 +1,173 @@
# Kustomize roadmap 2022
# Kustomize roadmap 2023-2024

Presented at the [January 26, 2022, SIG-CLI meeting](https://youtu.be/l2plzJ9MRlk?t=1321)
This document describes the items that we hope to make progress on over the next
1 year (H2 2023 and H1 2024). Take this roadmap as more of what we hope to achieve
rather than what we promise to achieve, as some items in this doc are highly dependent
on the success that we have on-ramping new contributors to the project, and other
items will depend on external contributions, which can vary.

kustomize maintainers: @knverey, @natasha41575
If you are interested in contributing to a particular area, you can look through
the project board for that area and assign yourself to one of the issues. It is
recommended to start with smaller issues to ramp up on the project before starting
to tackle larger issues.

[Objective: Improve contributor community](#objective-improve-contributor-community)
## Kustomize contributors (at time of writing):

[Objective: Improve end-user experience](#objective-improve-end-user-experience)
kustomize owner: @natasha41575

[Objective: Improve extension experience](#objective-improve-extension-experience)
kustomize maintainers: @annasong20, @koba1t

## Objective: Improve contributor community
kustomize contributors: @varshaprasad96

**_WHO: End user who also contributes source code._**

Top priority:
# H2 2023

- Kustomization v1 (also end-user impact) ([PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/12))
- Remove the following fields:
- [vars](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/2052)
- [patchesJson6902, patchesStrategicMerge (consolidate on \`patches)](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4376)
- [helmChartInflationGenerator, helmCharts, helmGlobals](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4401)
- all long-deprecated fields in Kustomization v1 such as \`bases\` and those being accommodate by kustomize edit \[[see code snippet](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/blob/ee4b7847f0beb6c0d2070673b10f23f7b3e92e82/api/types/fix.go#L15)\]
- Ensure that \`kustomize edit fix\` handles migrations for all those, and that anything it changes is not still present in v1.
- [Add reorder field](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3913). Default should be FIFO and legacy should also be supported (could add alphabetic and custom sort support eventually). Replaces -reorder flag.
- [Reconcile openapi and crds field](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3944)
- [Consider deprecating configurations field](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3945) (old, pre-plugin, pre-openapi global configuration)
- [Add a field to enable the managedby label](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4047)
## Goal: Create kustomize leadership and contributor playbooks

Second priority:
Contributors: natasha41575, annasong20

- Improve contributor documentation
- [Instructions to upgrade kustomize-in-kubectl](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3951)
Priority: High

Also very valuable to the project:
Effort: Medium

- [Improve the release process](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3952) to support regular biweekly releases [PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/7)
- Release sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api v1.0.0 [PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/5)
- [Reduce the public surface of the API module](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3942)
- [Vendor all transitive deps](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3706). Since kustomize is in kubectl, we must do as kubectl does to manage deps, exposing new transitive deps in code review.
- Project administration
- [Rename master branch to main](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3954)
In the past, when the leads have left in various kubernetes projects, it
left a wide hole that few could easily fill, leaving the remaining leads in a
bad position and the project understaffed. We should assume that we will need
to onboard new maintainers in the future, and should have playbooks for doing so.
As we grow the contributor base in kustomize, we will build these playbooks for
those who are contributing and those who are looking to grow into kustomize leaders.
To ensure the long term health and stability of the project, we should have:

- On-boarding guides for new contributors
- Clear guidelines for how to climb the kustomize ladder from contributor to approver to owner
- A plan (maybe a schedule) for future kustomize cohorts
- A succession plan, in case the current kustomize leads ever decide to step down

## Goal: Onboard 2-5 new contributors to kustomize

## Objective: Improve end-user experience
Contributors: natasha41575, annasong20, koba1t

**_WHO: End user that wants kustomize build artifacts (binaries, containers)._**
Priority: High

Top priorities:
Effort: High

- Bug fixes:
- Fix bugs in basic anchor support: [issue query](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aarea%2Fanchors)
- integer keys support: [#3446](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3446)
- kyaml not respecting \`$patch replace|retainKeys\`: [#2037](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/2037)
- kustomize removing quotes from namespace field values: [#4146](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4146)
- Kustomize doesn’t support metadata.generateName: [#641](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/641)
- Send kustomize CLI version number into kubectl ([kubectl issue](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubectl/issues/797) / [kustomize issue](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/1424))
- Kustomize performance investigations/improvements [PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/13)
- [Support generic resource references in name reference tracking](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3418)
- [KEP 4267: retain the resource origin and transformer data in annotations](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/pull/4267)
In order to make progress on kustomize goals in the future, we need to increase the
level of staffing on kustomize. We should leverage community contributions to keep kustomize
healthy and making progress.

Secondary priorities:
The primary means in which we will try to find new kustomize contributors is through the new kustomize
maintainer training cohort. We will lead a group of ~20 kubernetes community members through a 3-6 month
training program, involving talk sessions, bug scrubs, issue triage, PR reviews, and coding projects for
each member. The effort from existing kustomize maintainers here will be to:
- Organize the cohort, so that each cohort member feels productive and understands what they should work on
- Align motivation of the cohort members with the work that we assign to them.
- Review PRs from cohort members in a timely manner.
- Be the point(s) of contact for questions/escalations
- Lead weekly stand-ups and monthly bug scrubs

- kustomize cli v5 ([PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/14))
- [Drop the --reorder flag](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3947)
- [Graduate cfg read-only commands out of alpha](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4090).
- [Drop the –enable-managedby-label](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4047)
- Drop old plugin-related fields in favor of [the Catalog-style fields](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cli/2906-kustomize-function-catalog).
- [Drop the helm flags](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4401)
- [Confusion around namespace replacement](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/880).
At the end of all this, if we have a small team of contributors to kustomize, who understand its founding
philosophy and intentions, we should be able to keep the project up to date while we maintain influence as leads.

Also very valuable to the project:
## Goal: Improve kustomize extensibility through KRM functions and CRD support

- [Overinclusion of root directory error in error messages](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4348)
- [Add kustomize localize command](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3980)
- [Fix Windows support in test suite](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4001)
- Improve end-user documentation [PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/9)
Contributors: koba1t, varshaprasad96, external contributors

Priority: High

## Objective: Improve extension experience
Effort: High

**_WHO: Plugin developers: end users who extend kustomize, but don’t think about internals._**
Project board: https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes-sigs/projects/53/views/1

This objective is described in detail in the [Kustomize Plugin Graduation KEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cli/2953-kustomize-plugin-graduation) / [PROJECT](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/projects/15) .
For a long time, we have supported KRM functions as the proper way to implement custom generators and transformers.
However, due to limited staffing, we have been unable to drive this feature out of alpha in kustomize. The two
main features which we hope to make progress on are Composition and Catalog, two long-standing proposals for which
numerous users have been waiting for a long time. There are several open issues
regarding KRM functions where our long-term answer has been these two features, but users have been hearing about them
for over a year without seeing any progress. If we can implement them, they will vastly improve usability and security
of KRM functions.

Top priorities:
One item that falls under this category that does not currently have a contributor is improving CRD support.
Currently, it is difficult to use CRDs properly, as there are three different fields (configurations, openapi, and crds)
where users have to input their CRD configuration. We need to consolidate these fields into one easy to use feature to
support CRDs. If you are interested in putting together a design proposal for how to tackle this task, please reach
out to the kustomize maintainers.

- Fix core usability issues with KRM Function extensions:
- [Better errors for function config failures](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4398)
- [Container KRM Mounts are not mounting via function parameters](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4290)
- [Resolution of local file references in extensions transformer configuration](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4154)
- [Do not silently ignore plugins when config has typo](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4399)
- [KRM Exec Function can't locate executable when referencing a base](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4347)
- Once core usability issues are fixed, [deprecate legacy exec and Go plugin support](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cli/2953-kustomize-plugin-graduation)
- [Catalog KEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cli/2906-kustomize-function-catalog)
# H1 2024

Secondary priorities:
## Goal: Improve the kustomize documentation

- [Remove Starlark support](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4349)
- [Composition KEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2300). The implementation is complete in [#4223](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/pull/4323), but depends on:
- [Convert resources and components to be backed by a reusable generator](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4402)
- [Enable explicitly invoked transformers to use default fieldSpecs](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4404)
- [Enable built-in generators to be used in the transformers field ](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4403)
Contributors: annasong20, external contributions

Priority: High

Also very valuable to the project:
Effort: High

- [Improve docs for kyaml libraries](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/3950), especially by adding examples.
- [Create a reserved field for plugin runtime information](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4405)
- [Develop new standard process for implementing builtin transformers](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/issues/4400)
Project board: https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes-sigs/projects/50

The kustomize documentation is currently fragmented, out of date, and lacks examples to fully understand its value.
We have had a "docs project" for a long time; we need to prioritize implementing it so that the documentation is in
one place, easy to find, and helps new users get started more easily. Some outcomes from this project should be:

- A single, unified website hosted on kustomize.io
- Updated information architecture, and a plan to keep it up to date
- End to end examples of using kustomize, including complex use cases

## Goal: Fix core usability bugs in kustomize

Contributors: external contributions

Priority: High

Effort: High

Project board: https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes-sigs/projects/51

There are several core usability issues that block some users from adopting kustomize features or in
some base block users from using kustomize entirely. These issues range from small bugs with workable but
inconvenient workarounds, to enormous feature gaps.

As part of this goal, we should work toward reducing the number of such issues that we have, making
kustomize work more smoothly and predictably, and be usable for a larger range of users.

There are a lot of important issues in this project, but the biggest and highest priority one is that
kustomize doesn't currently support metadata.GenerateName. Unfortunately, we don't currently have anyone
actively working on this issue, we would need an external contributor to reach out to the kustomize
maintainers to pick it up.

## Goal: Improve kustomize CI, release, & security patch processes

Contributors: external contributions

Priority: Medium

Effort: High

Project board: https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes-sigs/projects/54

The kustomize release process is currently done on-demand and is strictly linear. This means that if we find a CVE,
we are forced to release the next version of kustomize ASAP, and we are required to release every PR that has merged
since the last release. This can put us in a sticky situation if we have a breaking change that we are
not ready to release yet, but we need a patch quickly.

We should try to improve the kustomize release process so that we can release frequently, reliably, and with some
flexibility. The outcome of this effort should be:

- kustomize is released on a regular cadence (biweekly or monthly)
- kustomize is able to separate patch and feature releases, so that we can fix CVEs without needing to release
everything that we have in flight
- We can detect and fix CVEs early

## Goal: Take long-standing alpha commands out of alpha

Contributors: external contributions

Priority: Medium

Effort: Medium

Project board: https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes-sigs/projects/52

There are several commands in kustomize that have been alpha for a long time, including the cfg command group and
localize. Moving them forward can indicate good health of a project and these commands are useful to many users.
Some of these projects can be good starter issues for new contributors to have an easier onramp while others will
require more effort and thought.

0 comments on commit b834d8a

Please sign in to comment.