Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nimbus HA #422

Closed
wants to merge 85 commits into from
Closed

Nimbus HA #422

wants to merge 85 commits into from

Conversation

Frostman
Copy link
Contributor

@Frostman Frostman commented Dec 12, 2012

The second part of Nimbus HA implementation.


This change is Reviewable

Frostman and others added 30 commits October 17, 2012 15:30
Conflicts:
	src/clj/backtype/storm/bootstrap.clj
@Frostman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for comments, I'll start working on it in a few days.

@Frostman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi Nathan, all comments has been resolved.

Additionally, I've merged 0.8.2 branch into it.

@Frostman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is the list of some useful compare views:

nathanmarz:0.8.2...Frostman:1a172603225bdcea8f7ed998e791e6992ef970e8 - all changes for Nimbus Storage mechanism

0.8.2...Frostman:nimbus-ha - all Nimbus HA feature changes

@Frostman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Branch 0.8.2 has been merged (https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm/blob/0.8.2/CHANGELOG.md)

@Frostman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nathan, any comments?

Thank you.

@nebrera
Copy link

nebrera commented Jun 12, 2013

is nimbus available in HA wit 0.8.2 version ?

Thanks

@herberteuler
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Frostman , we'd like to test this, are there any documents on new configurations/how to deploy etc?

@vinceyang
Copy link

@Frostman , supervisor must download from nimbus,nimbus address need to get from leader election zk. otherwise when leader change supervisor can't download jars.
is i miss somethings?

@ekohlwey
Copy link

@Frostman whats the chance of getting this pull request submitted against the new hosting at Apache? Would you be willing to sign the apache contributor documents so that (should someone else want to) they could begin iterating this patch within the apache community process?

@clehene
Copy link

clehene commented Jan 14, 2020

This took a while :)

@d2r
Copy link
Contributor

d2r commented Jan 15, 2020

:)
It has been tracked in the Apache repo: https://github.com/apache/storm/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
9 participants