Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADDED] Connection type "in process" #221

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kozlovic
Copy link
Member

@kozlovic kozlovic commented May 8, 2024

Added ConnectionTypeInProcess to the UserPermissionLimits.AllowedConnectionTypes list of possible types.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic ivan@synadia.com

Added `ConnectionTypeInProcess` to the `UserPermissionLimits.AllowedConnectionTypes`
list of possible types.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
@kozlovic kozlovic requested a review from aricart May 8, 2024 01:53
@kozlovic
Copy link
Member Author

kozlovic commented May 8, 2024

@aricart As usual, doing this PR and once merged, would you mind doing a release? I have a server PR that will need to be updated to point to proper commit.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8995033103

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 81.07%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8740371896: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2728
Relevant Lines: 3365

💛 - Coveralls

@kozlovic
Copy link
Member Author

kozlovic commented May 8, 2024

@aricart I am waiting on some feedback from the user on the NATS Server issue, so please hold off the review until I hear back. I will post here when ready for review. Switching to Draft to make sure there is no merge by mistake.

@kozlovic kozlovic marked this pull request as draft May 8, 2024 20:24
@kozlovic kozlovic marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2024 15:24
@kozlovic
Copy link
Member Author

kozlovic commented May 9, 2024

@aricart Ok, I heard from the user and that will work. So you can review now. Thanks!

@aricart
Copy link
Member

aricart commented May 9, 2024

Doing

Copy link
Member

@aricart aricart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kozlovic
Copy link
Member Author

kozlovic commented May 9, 2024

@aricart Let me know if you can do a release. If not, I will reference the commit from main first and update when the release will be available.

@aricart
Copy link
Member

aricart commented May 9, 2024

@kozlovic let me cut a release

@aricart aricart merged commit 41dad79 into main May 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@aricart aricart deleted the add_in_process_conn_type branch May 9, 2024 16:08
@aricart
Copy link
Member

aricart commented May 9, 2024

@kozlovic done!!

@kozlovic
Copy link
Member Author

kozlovic commented May 9, 2024

@aricart Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants