Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REMOVED] Publish with reply APIs #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2016
Merged

[REMOVED] Publish with reply APIs #103

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2016

Conversation

kozlovic
Copy link
Member

Request/Reply pattern does not fit well with streaming.
Removing those APIs.
Note that one can get the NATS connection from a Streaming connection
and do non-streaming request/reply when desired without the need
to create a dedicated NATS connection.

Request/Reply pattern does not fit well with streaming.
Removing those APIs.
Note that one can get the NATS connection from a STAN connection
and do non streaming request/reply when needed without the need
to create a dedicated NATS connection.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 86.78% when pulling 17b6725 on remove_pub_with_reply into 39a13f0 on master.

@ColinSullivan1
Copy link
Member

LGTM.

@aricart
Copy link
Member

aricart commented Sep 12, 2016

LGTM

@kozlovic kozlovic merged commit e3716bd into master Sep 12, 2016
@kozlovic kozlovic deleted the remove_pub_with_reply branch September 12, 2016 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants