Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Coordinate values as doubles instead of num #186

Closed
navispatial opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Coordinate values as doubles instead of num #186

navispatial opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
🌐 geobase Related to the code package "geobase" refactoring

Comments

@navispatial
Copy link
Member

Geographic + vector data structures already handle coordinate values as double.

Change also other key classes handling geographic and projected coordinate data to use double type instead of num. The aim is to simplify class APIs.
@navispatial navispatial added refactoring 🌐 geobase Related to the code package "geobase" labels Aug 11, 2023
navispatial added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
@navispatial
refactor(geobase): change num to double in for coordinate values in v…
c6d011a 
…arious classes like Position, Box, Projected and ProjBox, many other refactorings too #186

BREAKING CHANGE: the API of Position and Box changed
navispatial added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
@navispatial
refactor(geobase): PositionData with coordinate value type generics a…
8396be3 
…s always double #186
navispatial added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
@navispatial
refactor(geobase): num to double changes on web mercator converter #186
26fdf54
navispatial added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
@navispatial
docs(geobase): update diagram about Position and Box #186
6129a87
navispatial added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
@navispatial
docs(geobase): about double and int types in position, bounding box a…
b494061 
…nd scalable coordinates #186 #183
@navispatial navispatial mentioned this issue Aug 11, 2023
Closed
@navispatial
Copy link
Member Author

Implemented in geobase 0.5.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🌐 geobase Related to the code package "geobase" refactoring
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@navispatial