feat: Add deposit yocto

[ChaoticTempest]

Closes #751

This only adds the depositYocto option to the call command.

I didn't add it to other commands since they were still using amount as an option. Should we go ahead and change those to deposit/depositYocto as well?

Usage:

$ near call $id $fn_name $params --accountId $id --depositYocto 10000000000000000000000000

Versus the equivalent with deposit:

$ near call $id $fn_name $params --accountId $id --deposit 10

[ChaoticTempest]

Also, Travis CI is failing on my usage of null coalescing. What JS version are we using?

[volovyks]

I don't think that we should add a separate option here.
And we definitely should not use it as a flag.
@mikedotexe I do not understand the motivation in your comment here: #751 (comment)

I would say, that we need to design it the next way:
near call ... ... --deposit 000000001 it would be in N, for backward compatibility + deprecation warning.
near call ... ... deposit 1N
near call ... ... deposit 1yN for deposit in yoctoNEAR

If we know for sure that deposit is always in yoctoNEAR, then let's do it the next way:
near call ... ... --depositYocto 1 + add deprecation warning for --deposit
This one will be less flexible.

+, if we will have --deposit and --depositYocto at the same time we should not allow to specify them both (there is a conflicting functionality in yargs).

@ChaoticTempest please, provide an example of this option usage in the description.

[ChaoticTempest]

In the PR description or somewhere else?

[volovyks]

Yes, let's put it there :)

[volovyks]

Also, Travis CI is failing on my usage of null coalescing. What JS version are we using?

You should be able to check it somewhere in the CI setup. Do you have an access?

[volovyks]

I didn't add it to other commands since they were still using amount as an option. Should we go ahead and change those to deposit/depositYocto as well?

I believe that amount options do not always mean deposit. But if you thing that it should be renamed somewhere - that would be cool 👍 :)

[ChaoticTempest]

You should be able to check it somewhere in the CI setup. Do you have an access?

Oh I see now, it's using node js 12

I believe that amount options do not always mean deposit. But if you thing that it should be renamed somewhere - that would be cool 👍 :)

Ahh, I must've been mistaken then when I looked at it. No need to change it to deposit then