Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove alpha warning #345

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2023
Merged

Remove alpha warning #345

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2023

Conversation

ailisp
Copy link
Member

@ailisp ailisp commented Feb 23, 2023

Since we have done testing regarding arithmetic correctness in https://github.com/near/libbf-test, in the same test suite for the C++'s boost.multiprecision library. We consider the JavaScript runtime is reasonably secure for DApps and even financial DApps. The project is therefore moving forward from the alpha stage.

This doesn't mean a formal audit or comprehensive testing of entire quickjs runtime, but it is an due diligence effort to ensure the most critical part: value-related calculation is well-tested. We will continue doing ourselves, seeking professional audit team and supporting community builders to increase the reliability and security of near-sdk-js.

The contributing parts at beginning of the doc is duplicate to the ## Contributing section later, so it's also removed.

This PR closes #312.

Since we have done testing regarding arithmetic correctness in https://github.com/near/libbf-test, in the same test suite for the C++'s boost.multiprecision library. We consider the JavaScript runtime is reasonably secure for DApps and even financial DApps. The alpha warning is therefore removed. 

The contributing parts at beginning of the doc is duplicate to the `## Contributing` section later, so it's also removed
@ailisp ailisp mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@volovyks volovyks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we update the QuckJS dep in this PR?

@ailisp
Copy link
Member Author

ailisp commented Feb 24, 2023

Good point! I checked the quickjs commit in this PR is the same as we used in near-sdk-js and it's ahead of the upstream quickjs, so it is fine.

@ailisp ailisp merged commit 09ebf81 into develop Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When move out of Alpha?
2 participants