[chore] Reduced dependencies for various near_* crates

[akorchyn]

Compilation unit reduction:

• near-jsonrpc-primitives: 324 -> 181
• near-chain-configs: 321 -> 170
• near-chain-primitives: 325 -> 170
• near-client-primitives: 325 -> 215
• near-store: 414 -> 407 (this is actually not that great, but still an improvement. Also, I think we can extract metrics into a feature to improve compile time :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 63.88889% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.64%. Comparing base (fc6f94b) to head (22d4ae1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
tools/ping/src/lib.rs	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
tools/state-parts/src/lib.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
core/primitives/src/block_header.rs	90.90%	1 Missing ⚠️
tools/ping/src/csv.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11639      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.65%   71.64%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         788      788              
  Lines      161256   161263       +7     
  Branches   161256   161263       +7     
==========================================
- Hits       115552   115531      -21     
- Misses      40674    40699      +25     
- Partials     5030     5033       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility	0.23% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
db-migration	0.23% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
genesis-check	1.35% <2.94%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration-tests	37.83% <58.33%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
linux	69.05% <63.88%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
linux-nightly	71.13% <63.88%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
macos	52.65% <50.00%> (+1.62%)	⬆️
pytests	1.59% <2.94%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
sanity-checks	1.38% <2.94%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	66.24% <50.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
upgradability	0.28% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Longarithm]

Great work. I left comments mostly for readability, because I was not very familiar with the goal and the approach before.

[akorchyn]

As you have mentioned, I have created a new issue: #11652

[Longarithm]

That's amazing, thank you for your contribution!

[akorchyn]

@Longarithm Hey, any chance to merge that in the coming future?

[Longarithm]

Sorry, I forgot that external contributors don't have merge permissions :(
Next time feel free to ping me in Zulip as well.

[akorchyn]

Sure thing. Thanks !