Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate if we should use near-fetch #51

Open
dndll opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate if we should use near-fetch #51

dndll opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@dndll
Copy link
Collaborator

dndll commented Oct 23, 2023

We are reimplementing a bunch of stuff near-fetch already has - Ideally we just contribute work there (unless they're using incompatible runtimes), but we should try to reach a sovereign client that isn't broken by these things.

near-fetch also already has:

  • memoization of nonces
  • retryability

If it doesn't have archival failover, we should probably roll up our stuff into that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant