Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

let the user decide wether he wants to use bool instead of boolean #41

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jens1o
Copy link
Contributor

@jens1o jens1o commented May 19, 2017

No description provided.

@jens1o
Copy link
Contributor Author

jens1o commented May 19, 2017

When the general change is good to you, I'll create the tests if you want to.(even though I don't know how I can test 3rd party resources.)

@neild3r
Copy link
Owner

neild3r commented May 19, 2017

We should probably do int/integer as well and say use short names instead of long names option instead of specifically for booleans, in terms of testing we could update the unit tests to support passing in config options

@jens1o
Copy link
Contributor Author

jens1o commented May 19, 2017

I like that idea. I'll do it asap. Could you update the units test, please? (I'm not very talented with ts at all.)

@jens1o
Copy link
Contributor Author

jens1o commented May 23, 2017

Closing this in favor of an upcoming pr.

@jens1o jens1o closed this May 23, 2017
@jens1o jens1o deleted the jens1o-bool-boolean branch May 23, 2017 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants