Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improvements for neo4j-harness #4330

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

improvements for neo4j-harness #4330

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

sarmbruster
Copy link
Contributor

3 small improvements for neo4j-harness:

  • expose GraphDatabaseService in ServerControls and Neo4jRule -> enables assertions based on GDB
  • enable GDB based fixtures by using Function<GraphDatbaseService,Void>
  • InProcessServerBuilder and Neo4jRule use a exisiting graph.db

* expose GraphDatabaseService in ServerControls and Neo4jRule -> enables assertions based on GDB
* enable GDB based fixtures by using Function<GraphDatbaseService,Void>
* InProcessServerBuilder and Neo4jRule use a exisiting graph.db
@ikwattro
Copy link
Contributor

Big 👍

TestServerBuilder has a copyFrom(File) method that populates the server's graph db directory with the contents of an existing store.
@sarmbruster
Copy link
Contributor Author

updated the PR based on a discussion with @cleishm. Instead of directly using the source store, it is copied over using `TestServerBuilder.copyFrom(File)?

@jakewins
Copy link
Contributor

jakewins commented Apr 8, 2015

Looks good Stefan!

@jakewins
Copy link
Contributor

jakewins commented Apr 8, 2015

Would you add a small note in the changelog of this module to the PR?

@jakewins
Copy link
Contributor

@sarmbruster looks good! I've rebased this onto latest 2.3 and squashed it into one commit, will merge once this PR is green: #4516

@jakewins jakewins closed this Apr 23, 2015
@sarmbruster sarmbruster deleted the harness branch September 8, 2015 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants