Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't pass tenant_id in location_config requests from storage controller #7476

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

arpad-m
Copy link
Member

@arpad-m arpad-m commented Apr 23, 2024

Tested this locally via a simple patch, the tenant_id is now gone from the json.

Follow-up of #7055, prerequisite for #7469.

@arpad-m arpad-m requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2024 11:09
@arpad-m arpad-m requested review from arssher and jcsp April 23, 2024 11:09
@koivunej
Copy link
Contributor

I was wondering why it was repeated, great.

@arpad-m arpad-m enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2024 11:22
@arpad-m arpad-m merged commit fa12d60 into main Apr 23, 2024
47 of 48 checks passed
@arpad-m arpad-m deleted the arpad/remove_tenant_id_storage_controller branch April 23, 2024 11:42
Copy link

2760 tests run: 2642 passed, 0 failed, 118 skipped (full report)


Code coverage* (full report)

  • functions: 28.1% (6464 of 23041 functions)
  • lines: 46.8% (45676 of 97593 lines)

* collected from Rust tests only


The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
99abdde at 2024-04-23T11:52:12.582Z :recycle:

arpad-m added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Follow-up of #7055 and #7476 to remove `tenant_id` from
`TenantLocationConfigRequest` completely. All components of our system
should now not specify the `tenant_id`.

cc neondatabase/cloud#11791
conradludgate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
Follow-up of #7055 and #7476 to remove `tenant_id` from
`TenantLocationConfigRequest` completely. All components of our system
should now not specify the `tenant_id`.

cc neondatabase/cloud#11791
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants