!!! TASK: Move ContentRepositoryId to SharedModel namespace

[mhsdesign]

Originally the content repository didnt know its id but with the change #4310 we added it.
Thats why i presume the ContentRepositoryId lived in the factory namespace.
But since we now like to expose it in the ContentRepository and in the to be conceptualised NodeIdentity the idea about its location changed. The dto does no longer belong to the Factory namespace.

ContentRepositoryId should not be in that namespace o.O

Originally posted in #4868 (comment)

Upgrade instructions

Instead of referencing Neos\ContentRepository\Core\Factory\ContentRepositoryId you should reference Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\ContentRepository

(That can as well be a simple string replace)

Review instructions

Checklist

• Code follows the PSR-2 coding style
• Tests have been created, run and adjusted as needed
• The PR is created against the lowest maintained branch
• Reviewer - PR Title is brief but complete and starts with FEATURE|TASK|BUGFIX
• Reviewer - The first section explains the change briefly for change-logs
• Reviewer - Breaking Changes are marked with !!! and have upgrade-instructions

[mhsdesign]

Ui adjustments neos/neos-ui#3717

[bwaidelich]

Makes sense, thanks for taking care!

[dlubitz]

OMG ... this means we also have to adopt all external packages. 🙈

[mhsdesign]

jup, but we already have to because of the workspaces and subtree tags 😅

and its not that widely used, for example pure fusion packages wont be affected.

Anke and me discussed that after this week we should probably check on a few packages ^^