refactor: use flexible array in buffblock_T #22090
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ii14
commented
Feb 1, 2023
ii14
force-pushed
the
refactor/inline_bh_first
branch
from
48686aa
to
27f50b2
Compare
ii14
force-pushed
the
refactor/inline_bh_first
branch
from
27f50b2
to
16b750d
Compare
ii14
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
buffheader unnecessarily also contained b_str from the buffblock_T struct. inline b_next in buffheader.this change is needed for the #22072 refactor, as you couldn't use a flexible array for b_str in buffblock, because it's nested in other structs.